From: John White (jan_white7@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 17 2002 - 23:01:08 GMT-3
Hi Jaspreet
You not alone with your feelings. I was going to share my experience with
the group from the last attempt in San Jose, but you did pretty good job.
And it wasn't my first time around either.I too left the lab room with
smile, and general feeling of satisfaction. Only to find out next day , that
I miserably failed .What is worse, some sections were graded 0 points.! It
is imposible, I thought, I tested it and it did
w o r k!!!.My next thought was to call Cisco, and ask them to manually
revaluate my configs again.I wanted to know were I made mistake. Then I
realized it's pointless. I'm on the lost position anyway. First one has to
pay 250 dollars , second they won't tell you anyway.It is stated clearly on
Cisco web site - it's secret.
So the question is what we can do about it.? How can I improve myself if
don't even know where I made mistake. Don't you guys find this ridiculous
that we pay big bucks (at least for my) just to have lunch at Cisco for
1250.?I don't even mention all other costs involved.
On top of everyting we sign NDA, so we can't even talk about.
I think , that we as Cisco clients paying big bugs should request better
service then this.
I don't mind failing, I just want to know why.
Before 1-day format , testing was done over 2 day period. At least one had a
chance to talk to proctor, and learn something new.
What do you think guys.?I'm sure it must be the better way to do this
process.
Jan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:35 GMT-3