From: cannonr (cannonr@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 22:07:48 GMT-3
At the CCIE Lab Power Session (Friday session) at Networkers in Orlando, the
question was asked about ISIS. They said to learn the basic's about ISIS
just in case it did pop up but not to spend much time on it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Meyer, J. (Johan)" <JohanMe@nedcor.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 5:04 AM
Subject: Is there IS-IS in the CIsco LAB
> Please can someone tell me if there is IS-IS in the CCIE LAB
> as Cisco says that there is not but some say there is??
>
> Has anybody actually had a question regarding IS-IS in there CISCO Lab?
>
> Two attempts allready and there was no IS-IS
>
> Thanks
> Johan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hunt Lee [mailto:huntl@webcentral.com.au]
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:16 AM
> To: 'Gyori Gabor'
> Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: Route Reflector /w next-hop-self
>
>
> Hello Gyori,
>
> Thanks so much for the explanation. But in this case, I'm actually using
> next-hop-self between 2 Route Reflectors (RTA & RTD)?? Is this bad too??
>
>
> 1.0.0.0/9 --- RTB-| |-RTE --- 3.3.0.0/17
> |--RTA--RTD--|
> 2.0.0.0/10 ---RTC-| |-RTF --- 4.4.4.0/28
>
>
> So RTB & RTC are route reflector clients of RTA &
> RTE & RTF are route reflector clients of RTD
>
> All routers are in the same AS.
>
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> Best Regards,
> Hunt
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gyori Gabor [mailto:Gabor.Gyori@lnx.hu]
> Sent: Saturday, 6 July 2002 11:05 PM
> To: Hunt Lee; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: IOS bug??
>
>
> The route reflector server never changes any BGP attribute on route that
is
> heard from a route reflector client and forwarded to an other client.
> In includes localpref and next-hop, communities, etc.
> It is in order to avoid routing loop.
> So it is a (useful) feature, not a bug.
>
> Gabor
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Hunt Lee [mailto:ciscoforme3@yahoo.com.au]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 2:18 PM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: IOS bug??
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if there is a bug on IOS Version 12.0(10)?? I have
> > tried a few other 12.0 images, but there seems to be something wrong
> > with the "neighbor x.x.x.x next-hop self" command.
> >
> > RTD is directly connected to RTA
> >
> > RTA is 172.16.1.3
> > RTD is 172.17.1.3
> >
> > From RTD:
> >
> > router bgp 1
> > no synchronization
> > neighbor 172.16.1.3 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.16.1.3 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.16.1.3 next-hop-self
> > neighbor 172.17.1.1 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.17.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.17.1.1 route-reflector-client
> > neighbor 172.17.1.2 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.17.1.2 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.17.1.2 route-reflector-client
> >
> > On RTA
> >
> > router bgp 1
> > no synchronization
> > bgp log-neighbor-changes
> > neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.16.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.16.1.1 route-reflector-client
> > neighbor 172.16.1.2 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.16.1.2 update-source Loopback0
> > neighbor 172.16.1.2 route-reflector-client
> > neighbor 172.17.1.3 remote-as 1
> > neighbor 172.17.1.3 next-hop-self
> > no auto-summary
> >
> >
> > But only the routes via RTA has been successfully changed it's
> > Next-Hop, but not the ones via RTD.
> >
> > RouterA#sh ip bgp
> > BGP table version is 3, local router ID is 172.16.1.3
> > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> > internal
> > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> >
> > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> > *>i1.0.0.0/9 172.16.1.1 0 100 0 i
> > *>i2.0.0.0/10 172.16.1.2 0 100 0 i
> > * i3.3.0.0/17 172.17.1.1 0 100 0 i
> > * i4.4.4.0/28 172.17.1.2 0 100 0 i
> > RouterA#
> >
> >
> > RouterD#sh ip bgp
> > BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 172.17.1.3
> > Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> > internal
> > Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
> >
> > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> > *>i1.0.0.0/9 172.16.1.3 0 100 0 i
> > *>i2.0.0.0/10 172.16.1.3 0 100 0 i
> > *>i3.3.0.0/17 172.17.1.1 0 100 0 i
> > *>i4.4.4.0/28 172.17.1.2 0 100 0 i
> > RouterD#
> >
> >
> > Please help....
> >
> > H.
> >
> http://www.sold.com.au - SOLD.com.au
> - Find yourself a bargain!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:33 GMT-3