RE: Is there IS-IS in the CIsco LAB

From: Meyer, J. (Johan) (JohanMe@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 09:05:54 GMT-3


   
Please note this is a quote straight from Cisco
I am not asking for questions related to any topics so I am NOT breaking any
rules!!
For everyone who has internet access this infomation is given

"The following topics have been removed from the lab exam content:

LAT
DECnet
Apollo
Banyan VINES
ISO CLNS
XNS
ATM LANE
X.25
Appletalk"

So ISO CLNS has been removed from the LABS??

Can we maybe have some one who works for Cisco and knows this to confirm.

Best Regards
Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: Meyer, J. (Johan)
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 12:04 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Is there IS-IS in the CIsco LAB

Please can someone tell me if there is IS-IS in the CCIE LAB
as Cisco says that there is not but some say there is??

Has anybody actually had a question regarding IS-IS in there CISCO Lab?

Two attempts allready and there was no IS-IS

Thanks
Johan

-----Original Message-----
From: Hunt Lee [mailto:huntl@webcentral.com.au]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:16 AM
To: 'Gyori Gabor'
Cc: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Subject: Route Reflector /w next-hop-self

Hello Gyori,

Thanks so much for the explanation. But in this case, I'm actually using
next-hop-self between 2 Route Reflectors (RTA & RTD)?? Is this bad too??

1.0.0.0/9 --- RTB-| |-RTE --- 3.3.0.0/17
                        |--RTA--RTD--|
2.0.0.0/10 ---RTC-| |-RTF --- 4.4.4.0/28

So RTB & RTC are route reflector clients of RTA &
RTE & RTF are route reflector clients of RTD

All routers are in the same AS.

Thanks!!!

Best Regards,
Hunt

-----Original Message-----
From: Gyori Gabor [mailto:Gabor.Gyori@lnx.hu]
Sent: Saturday, 6 July 2002 11:05 PM
To: Hunt Lee; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IOS bug??

The route reflector server never changes any BGP attribute on route that is
heard from a route reflector client and forwarded to an other client.
In includes localpref and next-hop, communities, etc.
It is in order to avoid routing loop.
So it is a (useful) feature, not a bug.

Gabor

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hunt Lee [mailto:ciscoforme3@yahoo.com.au]
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 2:18 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: IOS bug??
>
>
> Does anyone know if there is a bug on IOS Version 12.0(10)?? I have
> tried a few other 12.0 images, but there seems to be something wrong
> with the "neighbor x.x.x.x next-hop self" command.
>
> RTD is directly connected to RTA
>
> RTA is 172.16.1.3
> RTD is 172.17.1.3
>
> From RTD:
>
> router bgp 1
> no synchronization
> neighbor 172.16.1.3 remote-as 1
> neighbor 172.16.1.3 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 172.16.1.3 next-hop-self
> neighbor 172.17.1.1 remote-as 1
> neighbor 172.17.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 172.17.1.1 route-reflector-client
> neighbor 172.17.1.2 remote-as 1
> neighbor 172.17.1.2 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 172.17.1.2 route-reflector-client
>
> On RTA
>
> router bgp 1
> no synchronization
> bgp log-neighbor-changes
> neighbor 172.16.1.1 remote-as 1
> neighbor 172.16.1.1 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 172.16.1.1 route-reflector-client
> neighbor 172.16.1.2 remote-as 1
> neighbor 172.16.1.2 update-source Loopback0
> neighbor 172.16.1.2 route-reflector-client
> neighbor 172.17.1.3 remote-as 1
> neighbor 172.17.1.3 next-hop-self
> no auto-summary
>
>
> But only the routes via RTA has been successfully changed it's
> Next-Hop, but not the ones via RTD.
>
> RouterA#sh ip bgp
> BGP table version is 3, local router ID is 172.16.1.3
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *>i1.0.0.0/9 172.16.1.1 0 100 0 i
> *>i2.0.0.0/10 172.16.1.2 0 100 0 i
> * i3.3.0.0/17 172.17.1.1 0 100 0 i
> * i4.4.4.0/28 172.17.1.2 0 100 0 i
> RouterA#
>
>
> RouterD#sh ip bgp
> BGP table version is 5, local router ID is 172.17.1.3
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *>i1.0.0.0/9 172.16.1.3 0 100 0 i
> *>i2.0.0.0/10 172.16.1.3 0 100 0 i
> *>i3.3.0.0/17 172.17.1.1 0 100 0 i
> *>i4.4.4.0/28 172.17.1.2 0 100 0 i
> RouterD#
>
>
> Please help....
>
> H.
>
http://www.sold.com.au - SOLD.com.au
- Find yourself a bargain!



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:32 GMT-3