From: Ouellette, Tim (tim.ouellette@xxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 00:28:16 GMT-3
only turn a certain ospf process on for a certain interface. Such that if
you want the e0 with an ip of 1.1.1.1 then use your network statement under
whatever ospf process as "network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area x"
Either that or turn both ospf process's on that interface and
passive-interface whichever one you don't want and no adjacencies will form.
Sound right?
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: zlf [mailto:pstn100@sina.com]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 11:01 PM
To: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ospf process-id
hi,karwas
thanks for your answer,but I have another question, we know ospf pocess-id
is local meaning, so how we can control the other router form neighbor
relationship with the ospf process id that we want.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Przemyslaw Karwasiecki" <karwas@ifxcorp.com>
To: "zlf" <pstn100@sina.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: ospf process-id
> Assume that company A acquire company B.
>
> Both have networks, both are using OSPF, both are flat (area 0 only).
>
> You need to connect both, but don't want to blindly merge all routes
> from A and B.
>
> With dual OSPF processes on single router, you can control
> redistribution between 2 OSPF domains via redistribute with
> route-map(s)
>
> Przemek
>
> On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 00:12, zlf wrote:
> > hi,everybody
> > In ospf configuration we can set two or more process-id is a router,but
i don't know what's the situation use it and what's the really function we
use more process-id in ospf.
> > thanks
> > zlf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:31 GMT-3