From: Roberts, Larry (Larry.Roberts@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 00:14:45 GMT-3
Under the OSPF process that you DON'T want to form a neighbor relationship,
use the passive-interface Sx/x ( or whatever interface it is)
That will stop the hello's for that process from being sent out.
Thanks
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: zlf [mailto:pstn100@sina.com]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 10:01 PM
To: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: ospf process-id
hi,karwas
thanks for your answer,but I have another question, we know ospf pocess-id
is local meaning, so how we can control the other router form neighbor
relationship with the ospf process id that we want.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Przemyslaw Karwasiecki" <karwas@ifxcorp.com>
To: "zlf" <pstn100@sina.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 10:30 AM
Subject: Re: ospf process-id
> Assume that company A acquire company B.
>
> Both have networks, both are using OSPF, both are flat (area 0 only).
>
> You need to connect both, but don't want to blindly merge all routes
> from A and B.
>
> With dual OSPF processes on single router, you can control
> redistribution between 2 OSPF domains via redistribute with
> route-map(s)
>
> Przemek
>
> On Thu, 2002-07-25 at 00:12, zlf wrote:
> > hi,everybody
> > In ospf configuration we can set two or more process-id is a
> > router,but i don't know what's the situation use it and what's the
> > really function we use more process-id in ospf. thanks zlf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:31 GMT-3