Re: ospf routes in database not in route table

From: Joe Higgins (netsat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 20:52:52 GMT-3

• Next message: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: what is better -- "No Show" or "Go Unprepared""
• Previous message: Thangavel.Mudaliar@xxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Re: Singapore Lab seat Request"
• Maybe in reply to: Ademola Osindero: "ospf routes in database not in route table"
• Next in thread: Nick Shah: "Re: ospf routes in database not in route table"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Go to this link and see why.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/26.html
Ademola Osindero wrote:

> Hi group,
>
> Can there be any reason why a route existing in an OSPF database will not
> be installed in the route table?
>
> While practicing Cyscoexeprt lab, I mad routers r2, r5 and r6 to have ip
> ospf net non-broadcast and also configured there neighbors' addresses. This
> was all in the quest to modify the dead interval to 120seconds. But
> apparently no ospf route was installed on r2 except for routes emanating
> from r1. Could there be any reason for this?
>
> Regards,
>
> Osindero Ademola
> Schlumberger Network Solutions
> Tel: 234 1 261 0446 Ext 5427
> Fax 234 1 262 1034
> email:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com

• Next message: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi: "Re: what is better -- "No Show" or "Go Unprepared""
• Previous message: Thangavel.Mudaliar@xxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Re: Singapore Lab seat Request"
• Maybe in reply to: Ademola Osindero: "ospf routes in database not in route table"
• Next in thread: Nick Shah: "Re: ospf routes in database not in route table"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:31 GMT-3