From: kym blair (kymblair@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 15:02:03 GMT-3
If you have the time to go, it'd be a good experience. You'd get a
challenging scenario to work on for a day, and you'd be less nervous the
next time when you are ready.
IMHO, Kym
>From: Craig Columbus <Craig.Columbus@columbusconsulting.com>
>Reply-To: Craig Columbus <Craig.Columbus@columbusconsulting.com>
>To: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki <karwas@ifxcorp.com>
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: what is better -- "No Show" or "Go Unprepared"
>Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:32:49 -0400
>
>Is a swap allowed this close to the exam date? With the number of people
>who are trying to take the lab before Nov, couldn't you find someone to
>swap with?
>
>Craig
>
>At 11:49 AM 7/15/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>>All,
>>
>>As my lab date is just behind a corner (this Saturday),
>>and I overestimated (again....) my ability to allocate
>>enough time to study, I am wondering what is a better
>>strategy:
>>
>>1. Not to go to the lab and be "No Show"
>>
>>or
>>
>>2. Be there, knowing that I am unpreparred, and I will blow
>> it again (3rd time.... yuck!)
>>
>>I am not even thinking about lost money, as much as I am affraid
>>that after 3 failed attempts, next time I go there I will be given
>>killer lab, just because they will think that I am trying to be lucky
>>and take it without necessary knowledge.....
>>
>>This is not a case, really, I just have a very demanding job,
>>and I couldn't study enough.
>>
>>This is true -- I should know this before 30 days deadline passed,
>>but I don't know what I was hoping for... And now it is too late,
>>and I face this dilemma.
>>
>>Any thoughts?
>>
>>Przemek
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:31 GMT-3