From: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi (mamoor@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 14 2002 - 14:30:19 GMT-3
yes this is what i was saying.....
need confirmation on this....
cisco docs are really very confusing .... at some place they use (ar - cir)
* 1
and at some they use (ar - cir) * 0.125. Even when using Bc = cir * 0.125
-Mamoor
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Williams <bruce@williamsnetworking.com>
To: Lab Candidate <labccie@yahoo.com>; Ahmed Mamoor Amimi <mamoor@ieee.org>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: FRTS want to nail it down !!
> If the available bandwidth is 32000, then dont we still need to multiply
it
> by .0125 to get the bits per Tc?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Lab Candidate
> Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2002 1:03 AM
> To: Ahmed Mamoor Amimi
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: FRTS want to nail it down !!
>
>
> Mamoor,
>
> This is obvious, since you said the port speed is 64000 and cir is 32000,
> if you want to utilized the most of your available bandwidth for burst
> purpose, the be would be equal to port_speed minus cir, hence 32000 bps.
>
>
>
> I was reading the power-session 2002, here on page 66 they have given the
> values like :
>
> Port Speed: 64000 Bps
> CIR : 32000 Bps (Average Rate of Traffic Without Congestion)
> Mincir: 16000 Bps (Average Rate of Traffic With Congestion)
> Bc: 4000 Bps (Amount of Data Sent Per Interval)
> Be: 32000 Bps (Amount of Excess Allowed Once Credit Has Built Up)
>
> interface Serial0
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay class ccie
>
> map-class frame-relay ccie
> frame-relay adaptive-shaping becn
> frame-relay cir 32000
> frame-relay mincir 16000
> frame-relay bc 4000
> frame-relay be 32000
>
> Can someone explain why Be = 32000 , why not Be = 32000 * 0.125 = 4000
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:30 GMT-3