From: Fanglo P.M. MA (fanglo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 11 2002 - 22:27:58 GMT-3
Hi Kasturi,
The passive interface is for EIGRP but at the same router EIGRP should
redistribute into IGRP. And IGRP should advertize the route out of the
interface to its peer. It should nothing concerned with EIGRP on that
interface. But what I got is when I enter the passive interface on EIGRP the
IGRP peer no longer get the route. It seems the redistribution on the route
has somehow blocked by this command. Am I missing something? Anyone got
ideas?
Regards,
Fanglo
PS: As I'm in Hong Kong so that my reply will be a bit late as in different
timezone. Sorry for that.
-----Original Message-----
From: kasturi cisco [mailto:kasturi_cisco@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:42 PM
To: fangloma@pacific.net.hk; harish.dv@peakxv.net
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface
Fanglo,
Are u trying to say that u observe the "passive-interface" on Eahart to
block the EIGRP routes from being redistributed into IGRP such that the
routes are not seen in Curtliss ? Just trying to understand and try it out ?
Thanks
kasturi.
>From: "Fanglo MA" <fangloma@pacific.net.hk>
>Reply-To: "Fanglo MA" <fangloma@pacific.net.hk>
>To: "'Harish DV/peakxv'" <harish.dv@peakxv.net>
>CC: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface
>Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:43:44 +0800
>
>Hi Harish,
>
>Thanks for your reply. But the problem in concern is the passive interface
>only connected with IGRP where that router running both EIGRP and IGRP. It
>seems the passive interface command not only blocks the enqueue process to
>physical interface but also affected the redistribution. My view to passive
>interface is it only drop the packet out/in from the interface. Any idea?
>
>Regards,
>Fanglo
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Harish DV/peakxv
>Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 8:39 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: IP EIGRP summary address problem with passive interface
>
>
>Some one posted a problem with the scenario on Page 380 in tcp/ip vol.1
>Actually, the passive interface command behaves differently in eigrp. Look
>at this :
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/16.html
>
>I guess this is 12.0.9 onwards.
>
>The workaround is using a distribule list
>
>HTH
>
>Harish
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:27 GMT-3