From: lao ya li (hulaoya@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 11 2002 - 01:50:31 GMT-3
--- ccielab@groupstudy.com 5DU}ND#:> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's CCIELab
> mailing list. Because the
> server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster,
> you will be required to
> authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail
> address and are not a
> spammer.
>
> PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY
> CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
> YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE
> SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
> By confirming this e-mail you certify that you
> understand the following:
>
> 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure
> requirements.
>
> 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a
> commercial product.
>
> 3. All postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
> 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
> 5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
> 6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
> To confirm, simply reply to this message. No
> editing is necessary. Once
> confirmed, you will be able to post without
> additional confirmations.
>
>
> Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
>
> ------ORIGINAL MESSAGE---------
>
> From hulaoya@yahoo.com.cn Wed Jul 10 03:31:35 2002
> Received: from web15001.mail.bjs.yahoo.com
> (web15001.mail.bjs.yahoo.com [61.135.128.4])
> by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id
> DAA22588
> GroupStudy Mailer; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 03:31:30 GMT
> Message-ID:
>
<20020710033050.83843.qmail@web15001.mail.bjs.yahoo.com>
> Received: from [64.104.184.53] by
> web15001.mail.bjs.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 10 Jul
> 2002 11:30:50 CST
> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 11:30:50 +0800 (CST)
> From: =?gb2312?q?lao=20ya=20li?=
> <hulaoya@yahoo.com.cn>
> Subject: dlsw remote-peer tcp and dynamic option
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="0-1546771978-1026271850=:83302"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> --0-1546771978-1026271850=:83302
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
>
> HI Friend,
>
> r1:dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp ip-address of r2
>
> r2:dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp ip-address of r1 dynamic
>
> I think :
>
> Above configuration is meaningless.Dynamic should be
> used at both routers.
>
> it is wrong that one router uses the dynamic and the
> other side route does not use the dynamic.
>
> dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp ip-address of r2 should
> changed as dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp ip-address of r2
> dynamic
>
> Any comment is welcome for this configuration!
>
> rgds//lao ya
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> RxPP>^M7>[;aVPT- 4s@KLT!.=p!/K-=+P&0A?
> --0-1546771978-1026271850=:83302
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=gb2312
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> <P>HI Friend,</P>
> <P>r1:<STRONG>dlsw remote-peer</STRONG> 0
> <B>tcp</B><B> </B><I>ip-address</I> of
> r2<STRONG> </STRONG></P>
> <P>r2:<STRONG>dlsw remote-peer</STRONG> 0
> <B>tcp</B><B> </B><I>ip-address</I> of r1
> <STRONG>dynamic</STRONG></P>
> <P><STRONG>I think :</STRONG></P>
> <P><STRONG>Above configuration is
> meaningless.Dynamic should be used at both
> routers.</STRONG></P>
> <P><STRONG>it is wrong that one router uses the
> dynamic and the other side route does not use the
> dynamic.</STRONG></P>
> <P><STRONG>dlsw remote-peer</STRONG> 0 <STRONG>tcp
> </STRONG><I>ip-address</I> of r2<STRONG>
> should changed as </STRONG><STRONG>dlsw
> remote-peer</STRONG> 0 <B>tcp</B><B>
> </B><I>ip-address</I> of r2<STRONG>
> dynamic </STRONG></P>
> <P><STRONG>Any comment is welcome for this
> configuration!</STRONG></P>
> <P><STRONG>rgds//lao ya</STRONG></P><p><br><hr
> size=1><b>Do You Yahoo!?</b><br>
> <a
>
href="http://rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/?http://sweepstakes.yahoo.com/bank_survey
wave2/">RxPP>^M7>[;aVPT-
> 4s@KLT!.=p!/K-=+P&0A</a>?
> --0-1546771978-1026271850=:83302--
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:26 GMT-3