From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jul 10 2002 - 20:41:02 GMT-3
I have done that with secondaries but whenever I have tried to make a
subinterface on fast-ethernet it has required an ISL or 802.1q
encapsulation and I think it even spewed out a message about how
subinterfaces on Ethernet had to be married to VLANS. Is this only
possible on 10mbps ehternet interfaces?
Anthony Pace
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:39:10 -0400, "Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell)"
<JPaglia@NA2.US.ML.com> said:
> You don't have to construct VLAN's just to satisfy IPX encaps. You have
> the
> VLAN set up on the main interface, then create subs w/ the differing
> IPX
> networks and encaps, and you're good to go.
>
> Pags
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Anthony Pace [SMTP:anthonypace@fastmail.fm]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:22 PM
> > To: Prakash H Somani; Nick Shah
> > Cc: Todd Carswell; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: Re: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it
> > possible?
> >
> > I saw this IPX thread and it provoked some questions.
> >
> > What is IPX NETWORK DISCOVERY? IS it a way to have an interface
> > synamically gain an IPX network number?
> >
> > Also, If you use sub-interfaces instead of secondaries to support
> > different encapsulations and your media is Ethernet, does this mean you
> > need to create multiple VLANs for each sub-interace and segrate the A1
> > network onto one "wire" and the B2 network onto another "wire"?
> >
> > If this were a lab I would say that would work but in real life the
> > reason you might need one wore to have different networks and
> > encapsulations because several were allready on one wire. Is this there
> > a way to do the sub-interfaces where it is all still one big "wire"?
> >
> > Anthony Pace
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 9 Jul 2002 15:15:43 -0000, "Prakash H Somani"
> > <pdsccie@rediffmail.com> said:
> > > Hi Nick....
> > >
> > > It works....find
> > >
> > > A. Debug output
> > >
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.498: IPXRIP: Marking network 222 FFFFFFFF for
> > > Flash Update
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.502: IPXRIP: General Query
> > > src=222.00b0.64db.be20, dst=222.ffff
> > > .ffff.ffff, packet sent (via Ethernet0/0)
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.510: IPXRIP: positing flash update to
> > > 22.ffff.ffff.ffff via Loo
> > > pback0 (broadcast)
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.510: IPXRIP: positing flash update to
> > > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Et
> > > hernet0/0 (broadcast)
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.514: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> > > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Eth
> > > ernet0/0 (broadcast)
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPX:
> > > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPX:
> > > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> > > *Mar 6 04:09:29.566: IPXRIP: suppressing null update to
> > > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff (Eth
> > > ernet0/0)
> > > R2(config-if)#
> > > *Mar 6 04:10:14.928: IPX:
> > > Et0/0:5.00d0.58ad.27f1->5.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> > > *Mar 6 04:10:14.928: IPX:
> > > Et0/0:5.00d0.58ad.27f1->5.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> > > *Mar 6 04:10:27.429: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> > > 22.ffff.ffff.ffff via Loop
> > > back0 (broadcast)
> > > *Mar 6 04:10:27.437: IPX:
> > > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, rcvd
> > > *Mar 6 04:10:27.437: IPX:
> > > Lo0:22.0002.0002.0002->22.ffff.ffff.ffff ln= 40 tc=00
> > > pt=01 ds=0453 ss=0453, bad pkt
> > > *Mar 6 04:10:29.348: IPXRIP: positing full update to
> > > 222.ffff.ffff.ffff via Eth
> > > ernet0/0 (broadcast)
> > >
> > > B. Configuration details
> > >
> > > R5#sh runn int e0
> > > Building configuration...
> > >
> > > Current configuration:
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0
> > > ip address 150.50.50.2 255.255.255.240 secondary
> > > ip address 172.16.45.5 255.255.255.248
> > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > no ip split-horizon eigrp 100
> > > ipx network 5 encapsulation SAP
> > > end
> > >
> > > R2#sh run int e0/0
> > > Building configuration...
> > >
> > > Current configuration:
> > > !
> > > interface Ethernet0/0
> > > ip address 172.16.45.2 255.255.255.248
> > > no ip directed-broadcast
> > > ipx network 222 encapsulation SAP
> > > end
> > >
> > > regards....Prakash
> > >
> > > On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 Nick Shah wrote :
> > > >There was a post in the archives, which allowed for a method
> > > >(coupled with
> > > >debug ip packet) to find the IP EIGRP AS ##, but nothing that I
> > > >know of for
> > > >IPX eigrp.
> > > >
> > > >Btw, I juggled (read struggled :) a bit trying to get the ipx
> > > >network
> > > >discovery.. I tried the following but somehow couldnt get it to
> > > >work...
> > > >
> > > >* create sub-ifs with different encapsulations, and assign
> > > >different ipx
> > > >networks to it
> > > >* turn on debug ipx sap , debug ipx packet, debug ipx routing (I
> > > >think)
> > > >*but it showed me everything except what I wanted (bad IPX
> > > >network etc.
> > > >etc.)
> > > >
> > > >I used secondary ipx addresses (in lieu of sub interfaces), used
> > > >ipx eigrp,
> > > >ipx rip & even NLSP.. but no luck..
> > > >
> > > >rgds
> > > >Nick
> > > >----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Todd Carswell" <acarswell@nc.rr.com>
> > > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > >Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 1:23 PM
> > > >Subject: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it
> > > >possible?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I can do IPX NETWORK discovery. It made me wonder...
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to discover a neighboring IPX EIGRP Autonomous
> > > >System
> > > >Number?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thx
> > > > >
> > > > > Todd Carswell
> > > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:25 GMT-3