RE: IPX network #

From: Desimone, Aurelio (ADesimone@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 23:31:20 GMT-3

• Next message: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell): "RE: Re: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it possible?"
• Previous message: P729: "OT: Catalyst 'storm-control unicast' feature"
• Maybe in reply to: Jaspreet Bhatia: "IPX network #"
• Next in thread: Dennis.D.Adekola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: IPX network #"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
try typing this global command:

no ipx default-route

-----Original Message-----
From: Jaspreet Bhatia [mailto:jasbhati@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:09 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IPX network #

Folks,
               I am trying to configure the IPX network FFFFFFFE on my
interface and it says that the range of addresses that can be configured
is FFFFFFFD but the CCO says that you can give network nos. up to FFFFFFFE

When entering the IPX address syntax, use the following format:

      IPX network address1..FFFFFFFE

      IPX node addressx.x.x where x is 0..FFFF

      IPX addressipx_net.ipx_node (for example 3.0034.1245.AB45 or
A43.0000.0000.0001)

What am I doing wrong here ?

Thanks

Jaspreet

• Next message: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell): "RE: Re: IPX EIGRP Autonomous System Discovery -- Is it possible?"
• Previous message: P729: "OT: Catalyst 'storm-control unicast' feature"
• Maybe in reply to: Jaspreet Bhatia: "IPX network #"
• Next in thread: Dennis.D.Adekola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: IPX network #"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:24 GMT-3