From: Paglia, John (USPC.PCT.Hopewell) (JPaglia@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 16:34:19 GMT-3
Hey, the guys with real low CCIE #'s probably tested on Commodore 64
machines with smoke signals being used for redundancy instead of ISDN!!! At
least the higher # candidates are tested on more recent technologies.
And if any of you low # CCIE's are offended by what I said, please save your
typing and learn to take a joke!!!! ONLY KIDDING!!!! There's a place for you
fossils as well. HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Pags
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fred Ingham [SMTP:fingham@cox.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 11:52 AM
> To: Nick T; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: CCIE 10,000 hypothetical question?
>
> You could always say your CCIE# was 0x2710.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nick T" <kitt@vnet.net>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 4:42 AM
> Subject: OT: CCIE 10,000 hypothetical question?
>
>
> > If you get your CCIE, and you happen to be # 10k, good # to have or bad
> > one? Other than the obvious, that its good to have any # at all :)
> >
> > Just trying to talk about a slightly non-technical, but interesting
> > topic...as a relaxer after
> > the usual hard thinking days. :)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:23 GMT-3