From: Logan, Harold (loganh@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 12:08:02 GMT-3
Mine's an adtran 550. What priority are you using?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny.Wang@alderwoods.com [mailto:Danny.Wang@alderwoods.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:27 PM
> To: Logan, Harold
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com; Carlos G Mendioroz
> Subject: RE: ISDN and OSPF
>
>
>
> Hi Logan and Carlos,
>
> After i changed cost on the both dialer interfaces, i still
> got the same
> thing, just wondering anything else you changed, what
> value you ever used. Logan, what ISDN simulator you used?
>
> Thanks for your input anyway.
>
> r1#00:26:16: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface BR0/0:1 unbound from
> profile Di1
> 00:29:34: BR0/0 DDR: rotor dialout [priority]
> 00:29:34: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.19.1.6, d=224.0.0.5)
> 00:29:34: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 8358662
> 00:29:35: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up
> 00:29:35: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface BR0/0:1 bound to profile Di1
> 00:29:36: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now
> connected to 8358662
> 00:29:36: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1
> disconnected from 8358662
> , c
> ll lasted 1 seconds
> 00:29:36: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to down
> 00:29:36: BR0/0 DDR: has total 0 call(s), dial_out 0, dial_in 0
> 00:29:36: BR0/0:1 DDR: disconnecting call
> 00:29:36: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface BR0/0:1 unbound from profile Di1
>
> 00:30:14: BR0/0 DDR: rotor dialout [priority]
> 00:30:14: BR0/0 DDR: Dialing cause ip (s=172.19.1.6, d=224.0.0.5)
> 00:30:14: BR0/0 DDR: Attempting to dial 8358662
> 00:30:15: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to up
> 00:30:15: %DIALER-6-BIND: Interface BR0/0:1 bound to profile Di1
> 00:30:16: %ISDN-6-CONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1 is now
> connected to 8358662
> 00:30:16: %ISDN-6-DISCONNECT: Interface BRI0/0:1
> disconnected from 8358662
> , ca
> ll lasted 1 seconds
> 00:30:16: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface BRI0/0:1, changed state to down
> 00:30:16: BR0/0 DDR: has total 0 call(s), dial_out 0, dial_in 0
> 00:30:16: BR0/0:1 DDR: disconnecting call
> 00:30:16: %DIALER-6-UNBIND: Interface BR0/0:1 unbound from profile Di1
>
>
> r1#sh dialer
>
> BRI0/0 - dialer type = ISDN
>
> Dial String Successes Failures Last DNIS Last status
> 0 incoming call(s) have been screened.
> 0 incoming call(s) rejected for callback.
>
> BRI0/0:1 - dialer type = ISDN
> Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs)
> Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs)
> Dialer state is idle
>
> BRI0/0:2 - dialer type = ISDN
> Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs)
> Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs)
> Dialer state is idle
>
> Di1 - dialer type = DIALER PROFILE
> Idle timer (120 secs), Fast idle timer (20 secs)
> Wait for carrier (30 secs), Re-enable (15 secs)
> Dialer state is idle
> Number of active calls = 0
>
> Dial String Successes Failures Last DNIS Last status
> 8358662 49 0 00:00:09 successful
> Default
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Logan, Harold"
>
> <loganh@mccfl.edu To:
> "Carlos G Mendioroz" <tron@huapi.ba.ar>,
> >
> <Danny.Wang@alderwoods.com>
> Sent by: cc:
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> nobody@groupstudy Subject: RE:
> ISDN and OSPF
> .com
>
>
>
>
>
> 07/08/2002 02:24
>
> PM
>
> Please respond to
>
> "Logan, Harold"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I went ahead and set this up using Danny's configs, and
> setting the cost on
> the dialer interfaces fixed the problem. Before I did that, I
> got the same
> thing: the line was coming up from LSA's, but they weren't
> type 1's. I'm
> guessing that when the line is brought back down, that
> represents a change
> in the ospf cost, therefore the line needs to be brought back
> up? Danny, if
> you still have this set up, try doing 'debug ip ospf lsa-generation',
> observe what happens for a few minutes, then do an 'isdn
> disconnect int
> bri0/0 all'. You should see things fairly quiet until the bri
> line gets
> brought down, then it comes right back up as more lsa's are generated.
> Likewise, if you force the line down with isdn disconnect, it
> gets brought
> right back up along with a handful of lsa's.
>
> Does anyone else have any input on why this happens, or know
> of a way to
> fix the problem other then ip ospf cost?
>
> Thanks,
> Hal
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carlos G Mendioroz [mailto:tron@huapi.ba.ar]
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 4:01 PM
> > To: Danny.Wang@alderwoods.com
> > Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: ISDN and OSPF
> >
> >
> > Danny,
> > Short answer: fix the ospf cost of your ddr interfaces (via ip ospf
> > cost).
> >
> > If you take a closer look, you should see that hellows are
> > supressed for
> > the
> > DDR interfaces. The link is being set because of an LSU
> triggered by a
> > change in
> > cost of the link.
> >
> > HTH
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:23 GMT-3