Policy Routing

From: Dan Lockwood (dlockwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jul 09 2002 - 00:03:12 GMT-3

Next message: Chris Soechting: "RE: OSPF into IGRP"
Previous message: Danny.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: ISDN and OSPF"
Next in thread: Luan Nguyen: "Re: Policy Routing"
Maybe reply: Luan Nguyen: "Re: Policy Routing"
Maybe reply: Omer Ansari: "Re: Policy Routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I have the following route-maps and access-lists. When I set local policy to
use LOCAL-MAP I an not able to ping any destinations on my ACL. However the
route-map 10 works. Is there some documentation regarding why policy routing
likes the extended ACL over the standard ACL? Your thoughts are appreciated.

ip local policy route-map 10
!
access-list 1 permit 10.10.1.3
access-list 1 permit 10.10.1.5
access-list 1 permit 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 1 permit 10.34.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 1 permit 10.44.0.0 0.0.3.255
access-list 101 permit ip any 10.34.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 permit ip any 11.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 permit ip any 10.4.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 permit ip any host 10.10.1.3
access-list 101 permit ip any host 10.10.1.5
access-list 101 permit ip any 10.44.0.0 0.0.255.255
route-map 10 permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop 10.10.1.1
!
route-map LOCAL-MAP permit 10
match ip address 1
set ip next-hop 10.10.1.1

Dan Lockwood

Next message: Chris Soechting: "RE: OSPF into IGRP"
Previous message: Danny.Wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: ISDN and OSPF"
Next in thread: Luan Nguyen: "Re: Policy Routing"
Maybe reply: Luan Nguyen: "Re: Policy Routing"
Maybe reply: Omer Ansari: "Re: Policy Routing"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:22 GMT-3