From: Gyo (Gabor.Gyori@xxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 10:52:31 GMT-3
Hi Krzysztof !
You are absolutely right. I have tried the above second version (that you
explained first) and it works explicitly as You described.
The first one works with arbitrary peer router, the second need capable router
(IOS 12.1 or above as doc say).
Thanks for explanation,
Gabor
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Horszczaruk Krzysztof
> [mailto:Krzysztof.Horszczaruk@getronics.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:31 PM
> To: Gyuri Gabor; Harish DV/peakxv; Hunt Lee
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Quick Question....
>
>
> Hi Gyori Gabor,
>
> I think you are right and I am right too.
>
> in my understanding it works as follows:
>
> 1) when there is "neighbor soft-reconfiguration" configured
> on your router, there is no request sent to the neighbor, and
> all information is gathered from the local cache, buffer or
> table (how to name it ?)
>
> 2) when there is no "neighbor soft-reconfiguration"
> statement, then in case of "clear ip bgp * soft in" the route
> refresh request is sent to the neighbor and information is
> gatheret directly from the neighbor. of course it is possible
> only if the neighbor support this feature.
>
> the simple analogy is browsing online/offline.
>
> cisco support it starting from 12.0. I do not know if it is
> proprietary or not.
> you can determine if your neighbor is route-refresh-capable
> by "show ip bgp neighbors x.x.x.x"
>
> regards,
> Krzysztof Horszczaruk
> Senior Consultant, System Engineer
> Network Integration
>
> Getronics Polska Sp. z o.o.
> ul. Pulawska 352a
> 02-819 Warszawa
> http://www.getronics.com
> http://www.getronics.pl
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:21 GMT-3