From: Nick Shah (nshah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 08 2002 - 03:52:36 GMT-3
Is it correct to assume, R4, R5 & R6 are in same AS ?
And that R7 is in a different AS ?
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: <Giveortake@aol.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 3:41 PM
Subject: BGP Route REFLECTOR ?
> Here goes..
>
> R4 is hub router and it has a PVC to R5 and R6. There is no PVC between
R5 &
> R6. It is a point-to-multipoint. R5 & R6 also have Ethernets and are
> connected to R7 who also has an eth on the same subnet.
>
> R4 is peered to R5 and R6. R5 and R6 area peered to R7. R5&R6 are
NOT
> peered.
>
> So the question is, do I need to use the route-reflector-client on R4? I
do
> not believe so.
>
> When I do use the route-reflector client I get strange results on R5 and
R6
> when I do a show ip bgp. R7 is advertising a 192.x.x.x network. When
I
> use the Route-reflector client under the above scenerio, R6 shows TWO
paths
> to the 192.x.x.x network. One directly to R7 and the other through
> R5......... When I do the same show ip bgp on R5, it shows only ONE
> path to the 192 network via R7. If nothing else, I figured they ought to
> both have two ways but they dont.
>
> If anyone followed the above mess and wants to help let me know. I can
send
> configs........
>
> The above scenerio is from IPEXPERT lab 20-3.........
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:21 GMT-3