From: Vijay Venkatesh (falcon67@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jul 07 2002 - 18:05:53 GMT-3
use policy routing with route map.
-V
--- Oliver Boehmer <oboehmer@cisco.com> wrote:
> At 16:43 07.07.2002 -0300, Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
> >This would change some routing protocol info, but connected routes
> >go into the FIB almost directly, so I guess this would not do it.
> >
> >The reason I'm asking is because some times, I would like a
> >router connected to a network to forward the traffic to another
> router
> >and not to its interface.
>
> Hmm, why don't you use the "longest match" rule and create multiple
>
> more-specific statics to the desired next-hop (i.e. two /25 for a
> /24
> connected network)? If you use CEF, you will not be able to prevent
> traffic
> destined to the router's own interface address to follow the
> statics, but
> all the other destinations will do..
>
> oli
>
>
> >elping wrote:
> > >
> > > I have not tried this...but how about
> > > redistribute connected route-map xxxx
> > >
> > > Carlos G Mendioroz wrote:
> > >
> > > > Subject says it all...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos G Mendioroz <tron@huapi.ba.ar> LW7 EQI Argentina
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:21 GMT-3