From: elping (elpingu@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 19:22:30 GMT-3
that is release 6.3......in network where this ios does not exists witout
removing spanningt tree...how can it be done....
is there sucha thing as changing the mac address on the switch ?
\mit A~kan (TK-Network Gvz|mleri) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what about the root guard feature !
> if you enable root guard on the port which your -not wanted root- switch
> connected, that one never become root.
> Look the link !
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_6_3/conf
> ig/spantree.htm
> search "root guard" at the page.
>
> Best Regards
> umit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elping [mailto:elpingu@acedsl.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 23:40
> To: John White
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: Root bridge question
>
> man .....first my math now i can't read .......
> i was thinking in reverse.....
>
> The solution thy provide is good.......
> how about plauing with the costs
>
> John White wrote:
>
> > I don't get it. We don't want cat 5000 to become root brigde for vlan
> 100
> > .Why would you set it for lowest?
> > jan
> >
> > >From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> > >To: John White <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
> > >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: Root bridge question
> > >Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 16:28:08 -0400
> > >
> > >i do not like that solution either......
> > >the lower the priority the more likely the switch will become root
> > >
> > >set it to the lowest
> > >
> > >
> > >John White wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Group,
> > > > I sounds like a very trivial question, but I can't find right
> answer.
> > > > I'm doing commercial lab, and one of the questions is to configure
> the
> > >cat
> > > > 5000, so it will never become root bridge for specific vlan lets
> say
> > >100. As
> > > > solutions they provide command :
> > > > set spantreee priority 65535 100
> > > > I don't like this solutions. What happens if there is another
> switch
> > >with
> > > > the same settings?
> > > > My questions is there any other solution to this problem ?
> > > > Jan
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:20 GMT-3