From: elping (elpingu@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 17:40:25 GMT-3
man .....first my math now i can't read .......
i was thinking in reverse.....
The solution thy provide is good.......
how about plauing with the costs
John White wrote:
> I don't get it. We don't want cat 5000 to become root brigde for vlan 100
> .Why would you set it for lowest?
> jan
>
> >From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> >To: John White <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
> >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: Root bridge question
> >Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 16:28:08 -0400
> >
> >i do not like that solution either......
> >the lower the priority the more likely the switch will become root
> >
> >set it to the lowest
> >
> >
> >John White wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Group,
> > > I sounds like a very trivial question, but I can't find right answer.
> > > I'm doing commercial lab, and one of the questions is to configure the
> >cat
> > > 5000, so it will never become root bridge for specific vlan lets say
> >100. As
> > > solutions they provide command :
> > > set spantreee priority 65535 100
> > > I don't like this solutions. What happens if there is another switch
> >with
> > > the same settings?
> > > My questions is there any other solution to this problem ?
> > > Jan
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:20 GMT-3