From: dwclemons (dwclemons@xxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 17:27:06 GMT-3
How about this config on a e0 10 Meg interface interface
policy-map dlsw
class cisco
priority 3000
class-map cisco
match access-group 101
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
int e0
service-policy output dlsw
----- Original Message -----
From: "elping" <elpingu@acedsl.com>
To: "John White" <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: Dlsw queueing methods
> ok...le me give it a shot.....please correct any mistakes
> .
> since the question asks allow dlsw 30% only lets's use CAR..
> total speed 10megbits
> allow 3mbits for dlsw
>
> normal burst= CIR [bps] * (1 byte)/(8 bits) * 1.5 seconds
> settting normal burst = BE disables bursting
>
> interface FastEthernet0/0
> ip address 192.168.1.34 255.255.255.255
> rate-limit output access-group 101 3000000 375000 375000 conform-action
> continue exceed-action drop
> duplex half
> speed 10
>
> access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
>
>
> John White wrote:
>
> > That's fine. But which queueing method would you use, to restirict dlsw
to
> > certain maximum bandwith? Is it custom queueing or policing-CAR. I'm
really
> > confused on issue
> > Jan
> >
> > >From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> > >Reply-To: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> > >To: John White <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
> > >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: Dlsw queueing methods
> > >Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 11:56:41 -0400
> > >
> > >I was confused by this as well:
> > >to make it simple use
> > >
> > >only spcify port 2065 for dlsw...
> > >
> > >the other ports are used if you used priority
> > >
> > >John White wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > > I'm new to the group, so I started browsing archives recently. There
is
> > >a
> > > > lot good stuff there.Some questions though seems to never recive
> > >answers.I
> > > > guess people use their privite e-mail accounts, instead of list.I
notice
> > >,
> > > > that in May 2002 there was discusion going on regarding bandwith
> > >allocation
> > > > for DLSw . The question was which method to use in order to allocate
> > >DlSw no
> > > > more than 30% of interface bandwith. (token or ehternet). Is it
custom
> > > > queueing or CAR or CBWFQ?.Does it require to specify all 4 ports for
> > >traffic
> > > > or not (2065, 1981,1982,1983)
> > > > Thanks in advance
> > > > Jan
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:20 GMT-3