From: elping (elpingu@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 16:49:09 GMT-3
ok...le me give it a shot.....please correct any mistakes
.
since the question asks allow dlsw 30% only lets's use CAR..
total speed 10megbits
allow 3mbits for dlsw
normal burst= CIR [bps] * (1 byte)/(8 bits) * 1.5 seconds
settting normal burst = BE disables bursting
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.1.34 255.255.255.255
rate-limit output access-group 101 3000000 375000 375000 conform-action
continue exceed-action drop
duplex half
speed 10
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
John White wrote:
> That's fine. But which queueing method would you use, to restirict dlsw to
> certain maximum bandwith? Is it custom queueing or policing-CAR. I'm really
> confused on issue
> Jan
>
> >From: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> >Reply-To: elping <elpingu@acedsl.com>
> >To: John White <jan_white7@hotmail.com>
> >CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: Re: Dlsw queueing methods
> >Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 11:56:41 -0400
> >
> >I was confused by this as well:
> >to make it simple use
> >
> >only spcify port 2065 for dlsw...
> >
> >the other ports are used if you used priority
> >
> >John White wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys,
> > > I'm new to the group, so I started browsing archives recently. There is
> >a
> > > lot good stuff there.Some questions though seems to never recive
> >answers.I
> > > guess people use their privite e-mail accounts, instead of list.I notice
> >,
> > > that in May 2002 there was discusion going on regarding bandwith
> >allocation
> > > for DLSw . The question was which method to use in order to allocate
> >DlSw no
> > > more than 30% of interface bandwith. (token or ehternet). Is it custom
> > > queueing or CAR or CBWFQ?.Does it require to specify all 4 ports for
> >traffic
> > > or not (2065, 1981,1982,1983)
> > > Thanks in advance
> > > Jan
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:20 GMT-3