From: Jaspreet Bhatia (jasbhati@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jul 05 2002 - 17:06:45 GMT-3
George,
This was actually a big gotcha . I did not understand
it myself and had to look at the solution. But it makes perfect sense now .
Look at the conditions carefully . Synch cannot be disabled between R4 and
R13 and also teh 200.200.200.X network cannot be injected into any IGP . So
following the rules of IBGP relationships , there is no way anyone can get
that route into R4's routing table . So the trick here is to change the
relationship between R4 and R13 into an EBGP relation by implementing
confederations in AS 134 and putting R4 and R13 into different sub AS's .
Now the raltionship is an EBGP one so R13 will send teh route to R4 .
HTH
Jaspreet
At 02:27 PM 7/4/2002 -0500, Treptow, Georg wrote:
>Does anybody understand their BGP solution with the confederations and how
>to get the 200.200.200.x/25 networks accross to AS 100?
>
>Any help is appreciated - it just does not make any sense.
>
>Thanks'
>
>Georg Treptow
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:19 GMT-3