From: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx
Date: Thu Jul 04 2002 - 12:27:53 GMT-3
Gev
Even if you are not allowed statics, defaults or Null routes you can always
kill the route to null 0 using the
No discard route-internal
Command....
HTH
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Gev, Chaim [mailto:Chaim.Gev@hp.com]
Sent: 04 July 2002 16:05
To: Horszczaruk Krzysztof; ccielab
Subject: RE: Summarizing from OSPF
Thanks, This works and looks like the right answer.
I still wonder if manualy defining a route to null0 in order to summarize
will violate the rule "do not use static routes"
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Horszczaruk Krzysztof
> [mailto:Krzysztof.Horszczaruk@getronics.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 12:57 PM
> To: Gev, Chaim
> Subject: RE: Summarizing from OSPF
>
>
> what, if you create another ospf process let say ospf b on
> the router, then redistribute ospf a -> ospf b with summary-address ?
>
> this will create of course null0 route
>
> regards,
> Krzysztof Horszczaruk
> Senior Consultant, System Engineer
> Network Integration
>
> Getronics Polska Sp. z o.o.
> ul. Pulawska 352a
> 02-819 Warszawa
> http://www.getronics.com
> http://www.getronics.pl
>
> >>>-----Original Message-----
> >>>From: Gev, Chaim [mailto:Chaim.Gev@hp.com]
> >>>Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 8:43 AM
> >>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>>Subject: RE: Summarizing from OSPF
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> The scenario requirement is to run the routing protocol on
> >>>all interfaces. So the loopbacks network is already in the
> >>>OSPF database.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >From: Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com>
> >>>> >Reply-To: Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com>
> >>>> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >>>> >Subject: RE: Summarizing from OSPF
> >>>> >Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:53:02 -0400
> >>>> >
> >>>> >At 08:31 AM 7/2/2002 +0200, Gev, Chaim wrote:
> >>>> > >As stated in the IOS documentation: "For OSPF, this
> >>>command summarizes only routes from other routing protocols
> >>>that are being redistributed into OSPF". So, summary-address
> >>>will not summarize our loopbacks if we run OSPF on these
> interfaces.
> >>>> > >The requirement is to use a /32 mask for the loopbacks.
> >>>So setting network type on these interfaces will not make
> any change.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Why don't you redistribute your loopbacks with
> >>>"redistribute connected subnets ...." command? You'll of
> >>>course need a route-map to selectively add in the ones you want.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >hsb
> >>>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:18 GMT-3