From: Gev, Chaim (Chaim.Gev@xxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jul 04 2002 - 03:42:34 GMT-3
> The scenario requirement is to run the routing protocol on all interfaces. So
the loopbacks network is already in the OSPF database.
>
>
>
> >From: Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com>
> >Reply-To: Hansang Bae <hbae@nyc.rr.com>
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: RE: Summarizing from OSPF
> >Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2002 23:53:02 -0400
> >
> >At 08:31 AM 7/2/2002 +0200, Gev, Chaim wrote:
> > >As stated in the IOS documentation: "For OSPF, this command summarizes onl
y routes from other routing protocols that are being redistributed into OSPF".
So, summary-address will not summarize our loopbacks if we run OSPF on these in
terfaces.
> > >The requirement is to use a /32 mask for the loopbacks. So setting network
type on these interfaces will not make any change.
> >
> >
> >Why don't you redistribute your loopbacks with "redistribute connected subne
ts ...." command? You'll of course need a route-map to selectively add in the
ones you want.
> >
> >hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:18 GMT-3