From: Joerg Kohlenz (j.kohlenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jul 01 2002 - 18:42:12 GMT-3
hmmm i tried the following set up :
(ospf/irgp)
r2-------igrp/27----r5--igrp/30------r6---ospf/24-------r8(ospf)/30
on r8 i used a ethernet interface with a /30 mask. on r2,r6 and r8 having
ospf enabled. On r2, r6 and r5 igrp. on r6 redistribute the ospf
networks from r8.
result:
on r5 i see the correct /30 statement from the ethernet of r8, but on r2 i
will not see any route from r8. doing a summary on the r6 for the ethernet
will also not fix the problem.
sorry, no idea ?!?!
-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]Im Auftrag von
Dan Lockwood
Gesendet am: Montag, 1. Juli 2002 22:07
An: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Betreff: RE: IGRP problem
As a general question, how many different ways are there to solve a
VLSM/FLSM problem? Are there ways other than using default-network and
summarization? I have heard mention of tunnels but I don't know how that
solution would be implemented. Does anyone have any thoughts?
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: Gyori Gabor [mailto:Gabor.Gyori@lnx.hu]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 10:49 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: IGRP problem
Hi there !
I have the following problem:
OSPF IGRP /30 IGRP /24 OSPF
LAN /24 R1 ----------- R2 ------------ R3 LAN /25
Do You now a trick how to pass the routing information between the two
OSPF net using tandem, different subnet mask IGRP (tunnel and static routers
are not allowed) ?
Thanks,
Gabor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 19:36:16 GMT-3