From: kym blair (kymblair@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 29 2002 - 19:11:03 GMT-3
Gabor,
If your IP is working and you can ping all interfaces on the Frame, then you
should be able to do DLSW on any type of interface:
DLSW DIRECT OVER PHYSICAL INTERFACE:
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 124 pass-thru
interface serial0
frame-relay map dlsw 124 broadcast
DLSW-LITE OVER PHYSICAL INTERFACE:
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 124
interface serial0
frame-relay map llc2 124 broadcast
DLSW-LITE OVER MULTIPOINT:
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.3 124
interface serial0/0.3 point-to-multipoint
frame-relay map llc2 124 broadcast
DLSW-LITE OVER POINT-TO-POINT:
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.3 124
interface serial0/0.3 point-to-point
frame-relay interface-dlci 124
<NOTE: NO LLC2 MAPPING>
HTH, Kym
>From: "Raymond Jett" <rajett@cisco.com>
>Reply-To: "Raymond Jett" <rajett@cisco.com>
>To: Gyori Gabor <Gabor.Gyori@lnx.hu>, "yakout esmat"
><yesmat@iprimus.com.au>, <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: RE: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
>Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:47:39 -0500
>
>Just remember if you disable frame-relay inverse-arp that you need to map
>the protocol...
>
>frame-relay map llc <dlci>
>or
>frame-relay map dlsw <dlci> (If you use the 'pass-thru' keyword)
>
>Raymond
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Gyori Gabor
>Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 7:04 AM
>To: yakout esmat; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
>
>
>In fact I do not use subinterfaces.
>
>The config:
>
>R1:
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.101.1
>dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 124 pass-thru
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>!
>interface Serial0/0
> description To FR switch
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> frame-relay map dlsw 124 broadcast
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>
>R4:
>dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.104.1
>dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 421 pass-thru
>dlsw bridge-group 1
>!
>interface Serial0
> description To FR switch
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> frame-relay map dlsw 421 broadcast
> frame-relay lmi-type ansi
>
>Neither of the sides can see any dlsw input packets from the peer, altough
>the PVC is fine, IP is running on it when I map. Using llc2 maping it works
>fine.
>The map dlsw statement without broadcast does not work either.
>
>R1#sh dlsw peer
>Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
>uptime
> IF Se0/0 124 DISCONN 0 0 conf
> - - -
>
>I tried it with 12.1.14 - 12.1.14, 12.1.14 - 12.0.10 IOS version
>combination.
>
>Yakout, if You have a working IOS+config secnario, I look forward to get
>it.
>
>Thanks, Gabor
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: yakout esmat [mailto:yesmat@iprimus.com.au]
>Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:07 PM
>To: Gyuri Gabor; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
>
>
>My experience with direct encap over Frame, is that it doesn't work over
>Subinterface. Try it over Physical Interface it should work.
>
>Any body can correct me if I am wrong..
>
>HTH
>
>Yakout
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
>Gyori Gabor
>Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 6:46 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
>
>
>Dear list members !
>
>My first question as a new member: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
>
>The method for it is written on TAC pages:
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw3_rg.htm
>
>The essence of it:
> - remote-peer frame-relay pass-thru
> - frame-relay map dlsw on serial interface.
>
>Altough, using 12.1.14 IOS, it does not work for me (no connection).
>
>Do You have experience on it ?
>
>Thanks, Gabor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:44 GMT-3