From: yakout esmat (yesmat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 29 2002 - 10:35:23 GMT-3
Your config is not complete, or you are configuring your frame pvc on
subinterface and not physical.
The serial interface is not configured with IP address and fram map
statement. Here are my configs:
R1#
!
dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.55.101.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 103 pass-thru
!
interface Serial0
ip address 172.55.123.1 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map dlsw 103
frame-relay map ip 172.55.123.2 103 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 172.55.123.3 103 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
R3#
!
dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.55.103.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 301 pass-thru
!
interface Serial0
ip address 172.55.123.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map dlsw 301
frame-relay map ip 172.55.123.1 301 broadcast
frame-relay map ip 172.55.123.2 302 broadcast
no frame-relay inverse-arp
!
r1#sh dl pe
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
IF Se0 103 CONNECT 11 11 conf 0 - -
00:04:39
Total number of connected peers: 1
Total number of connections: 1
r3#sh dl pe
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
IF Se0 301 CONNECT 15 15 conf 0 - -
00:06:35
Total number of connected peers: 1
Total number of connections: 1
Try to put all your frame map statement on the physical and see.
HTH
Yakout
-----Original Message-----
From: Gyori Gabor [mailto:Gabor.Gyori@lnx.hu]
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 10:04 PM
To: yakout esmat; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
In fact I do not use subinterfaces.
The config:
R1:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.101.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 124 pass-thru
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Serial0/0
description To FR switch
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
frame-relay map dlsw 124 broadcast
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
R4:
dlsw local-peer peer-id 172.16.104.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0 421 pass-thru
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Serial0
description To FR switch
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
frame-relay map dlsw 421 broadcast
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
Neither of the sides can see any dlsw input packets from the peer, altough
the PVC is fine, IP is running on it when I map. Using llc2 maping it works
fine.
The map dlsw statement without broadcast does not work either.
R1#sh dlsw peer
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
IF Se0/0 124 DISCONN 0 0 conf
- - -
I tried it with 12.1.14 - 12.1.14, 12.1.14 - 12.0.10 IOS version
combination.
Yakout, if You have a working IOS+config secnario, I look forward to get it.
Thanks, Gabor
-----Original Message-----
From: yakout esmat [mailto:yesmat@iprimus.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 1:07 PM
To: Gyuri Gabor; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
My experience with direct encap over Frame, is that it doesn't work over
Subinterface. Try it over Physical Interface it should work.
Any body can correct me if I am wrong..
HTH
Yakout
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Gyori Gabor
Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 6:46 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
Dear list members !
My first question as a new member: DLSW direct encapsulation on Frame Relay
The method for it is written on TAC pages:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/prodlit/dlsw3_rg.htm
The essence of it:
- remote-peer frame-relay pass-thru
- frame-relay map dlsw on serial interface.
Altough, using 12.1.14 IOS, it does not work for me (no connection).
Do You have experience on it ?
Thanks, Gabor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:43 GMT-3