From: Saher A Ishak (saher@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 28 2002 - 08:55:29 GMT-3
guys ;
I think the main problem here is fast switching that is why he is asking his
question
when u are enabeling fast switching so u will be load balancing per session
not per packet
so I think this was the aim of your questions
but u can disable the fast switching to return to per packet load sharing
with no ip route-cache (interface command)
with the options of CEF or same-interface
best regards;
saher
----- Original Message -----
From: "yakout esmat" <yesmat@iprimus.com.au>
To: "Tom Young" <gitsyoung@yahoo.co.jp>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 1:34 PM
Subject: RE: Load blance
> Tom,
>
> All IGP's will automatically load balance between equal cost paths (BGP
not
> included) up to 4 different paths.
>
> IGRP & EIGRP can load balance between Unequal cost paths if you use
> "Maximun-paths" command along with "Varaince" under router process mode
>
> HTH
>
> Yakout
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Tom
> Young
> Sent: Friday, June 28, 2002 7:45 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Load blance
>
>
> Forgive me to ask a very simple quesion about load blance,
> if I don't config anything , which one protocol could do
> the load balance automaticly. The RIP, IGRP,RIGRP, OSPF
> and BGP.
> If I do some config , such as policy-routing. All of that
> protocols could do the load blance, right?
>
>
> Thanks alot
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:43 GMT-3