From: Ademola Osindero (osindero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 26 2002 - 06:46:41 GMT-3
Anthony,
There is an illustration of a mix/match in Karl Solie's book. If you want a
peer to have an access to an ethernet and a token-ring, you create one
ring-list that covers the token ring interface and a bridge-list, but with
the same ring-list number, to include the ethernet interface. You can
define the remote peer with this ring-lists number.
For example
bridge 1 proto ieee
dlsw local peer 1.1.1.1 promiscuous
dlsw bridge-group 1
dlsw bgroup-list 1 bgroup 1
dlsw ring-list 1 ring 1
dlsw remote 1 tcp 1.1.1.2
source-bridge ring 100
interface e0
bridge-group 1
int to 0
ring 16
source-bridge spanning
source-bridge 1 2 100
At 10:44 PM 6/25/2002 +0000, Anthony Pace wrote:
>Is there a way to mix/match them. What if I want a peer to have access
>to one Ethernet and one Token-Ring? What does a ring-list buy you if a
>port list includes TR + Serial.
>
>Anthony PAce
>
>On 25 Jun 2002 09:19:16 -0000, "Prakash H Somani"
><pdsccie@rediffmail.com> said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Port lists / Ring lists / Bridge group allow you to create
> > broadcast domains in a DLSw+ network. Using port lists / Ring
> > Lists / Bridge group, you can control where broadcasts are
> > forwarded.
> >
> > Ring Lists is used to define Token Rings.
> >
> > Port list is used to define Token Rings and Serial ports.
> >
> > Bridge Gorup is used to define ethernet bridge group.
> >
> > Friends correct me if I m wrong.
> >
> > regards....Prakash
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 Ademola Osindero wrote :
> > >Hi group,
> > >
> > >Can anyone please point out the difference between port-list,
> > >and
> > >ring-list/bgroup-list?
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >
> > >Osindero Ademola
> > >Schlumberger Network Solutions
> > >Tel: 234 1 261 0446 Ext 5427
> > >Fax 234 1 262 1034
> > >email:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:42 GMT-3