From: omer@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Jun 24 2002 - 17:07:48 GMT-3
Jake,
are you referring to the fact that you have to force the Hub (which is has
a multipoint intf) of a partial mesh to become the DR, so that all the
spokes can form adjacencies with it?
Omer
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Jake wrote:
> Wes,
> Thanks. However, if you read my message carefully, I put in parentheses th
at I wasn't
> talking about the obvious network type mismatch. Shoot, if I already forgot t
hings that
> basic after 10 weeks from passing, I'd be really worried. ;)
>
> Thanks anyway,
> Jake
> 9102
>
>
> --- Wes Stevens <ccie_miami@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > If you have a point to point sub interface on one end and a physical
> > multipoint on the other you will need to use a ip ospf network
> > point-to-point command on the multipoint end or they will not talk - the
> > hello times will be different. The other way to solve it is to manually
> > change the hello times.
> >
> >
> > >From: Jake <jakeczyz@yahoo.com>
> > >Reply-To: Jake <jakeczyz@yahoo.com>
> > >To: P729 <p729@cox.net>, Lance <Lance@advnetech.com>,
> > >ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: Frame maps and Interface-dlci
> > >Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 12:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
> > >
> > >Mas,
> > >I could be wrong, but I recall that there was an issue with using P2P
> > >connections between
> > >a p2p sub on one end and a physical on the other end. As I recall, there
> > >was a problem
> > >establishing OSPF neighbor relationships (no, not related to the network
> > >type) and it
> > >required a map statement on the physical side only. I don't remember if I
> > >could still
> > >ping, and very likely I'm mis-remembering this totally... but I'm sure
> > >someone in the
> > >group knows what I'm talking about if it exists. Please correct me if I'm
> > >wrong, I don't
> > >have sufficient motivation to test this on the eqipment sitting behind me.
> > >;-)
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Jake
> > >9102
> > >
> > >P.S. Is "Mas" short for Masutatsu? j/w (Used to train Kyokushin)
> > >
> > >
> > >--- P729 <p729@cox.net> wrote:
> > > > You should use the 'frame-relay interface-dlci' command for assigning
> > >the
> > > > DLCI to the local end of your point-to-point "connection." 'frame-relay
> > >map'
> > > > is used on multipoint interfaces to map destination layer 3 addresses t
o
> > > > local DLCIs. Maps aren't needed on P2P connections because there is onl
y
> > >one
> > > > "other end" on a P2P connection, whereas on a multipoint connection
> > >there
> > > > may be several and the router needs a means to know how to get where.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Mas Kato
> > > > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Lance" <Lance@advnetech.com>
> > > > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > > > Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 2:00 PM
> > > > Subject: Frame maps and Interface-dlci
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > If you have a point-to-point frame connections between two routers
> > >should
> > > > you
> > > > > use the frame map or the interface-dlci command?
> > > > > From the perspecitve of the lab is one correct and the other wrong?
I
> > > > know
> > > > > that they both work, however there has been some discussion on the
> > >what
> > > > > consitutes a correct configuration.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Lance
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:41 GMT-3