RE: MPLS, IPv6 on CCIE Lab

From: Erlend Ringstad (erlend@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 24 2002 - 18:23:01 GMT-3


   
At 21:07 24.06.2002, you wrote:
>but why add the 3550? why not add a 2950 or 3500?

why would you like to deploy more old equipment in the ccie lab
when they just threw out the tokenring crap? :D

3500:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/prodlit/1147_pp.htm
and don't say you ment 3500XL:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/prodlit/1714_pp.htm

and why would you want a 2950 instead of the neat 3550?
It's just a bigger chassis (and some rougher hw inside)
and it can router with the Enhanced Image license). But except
that it's almost the same box

:-)

--erlend
(8275)

>j
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Harish DV/peakxv [mailto:harish.dv@peakxv.net]
>Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:58 PM
>To: Larson, Chris (Contractor)
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; 'Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com';
>jkesemey@bellsouth.net; nobody@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: MPLS, IPv6 on CCIE Lab
>
>
>Pls check the last para in this:
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18
>
>Harish
>
>
>
>
>
> "Larson, Chris
>
> (Contractor)" To:
>"'Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com'" <Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com>,
>
> <Chris.Larson@ed. ccielab@groupstudy.com,
>jkesemey@bellsouth.net
> gov> cc:
>
> Sent by: Subject: RE: MPLS, IPv6 on
>CCIE Lab
> nobody@groupstudy
>
> .com
>
>
>
>
>
> 06/24/2002 10:02
>
> AM
>
> Please respond to
>
> "Larson, Chris
>
> (Contractor)"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>This appears to be a prevelant rumor and therefore may have some truth to
>it. I have also heard (before Cisco announced it) that they were removing
>token and would be replacing it with IP v. 6 and MPLS.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com [mailto:Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:59 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; jkesemey@bellsouth.net
>Subject: RE: MPLS, IPv6 on CCIE Lab
>
>
>The buzz so far is there is nothing mentioned about any new technologies
>but rather just a greater emphasis on the existing core technologies.
>
>Ian
>
>www.ccie4u.com
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: jkesemey [mailto:jkesemey@bellsouth.net]
>Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 8:29 AM
>To: ccielab
>Subject: MPLS, IPv6 on CCIE Lab
>
>
>Any ideas what technologies they may be adding to the lab to replace
>IPX, DLSW with TR, and IGRP?
>
>I heard mention about IPv6 and MPLS in the future.
>
>
>
> Jeff Kesemeyer
> CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE
> www.bradshawlabs.com
> "Your CCIE Rack Rental Source"



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3