From: Kleberg, Jason (JKleberg@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 24 2002 - 16:07:50 GMT-3
but why add the 3550? why not add a 2950 or 3500?>
j
-----Original Message-----
From: Harish DV/peakxv [mailto:harish.dv@peakxv.net]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:58 PM
To: Larson, Chris (Contractor)
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; 'Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com';
jkesemey@bellsouth.net; nobody@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: MPLS, IPv6 on CCIE Lab
Pls check the last para in this:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/625/ccie/ccie_program/whatsnew.html#18
Harish
"Larson, Chris
(Contractor)" To:
"'Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com'" <Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com>,
<Chris.Larson@ed. ccielab@groupstudy.com,
jkesemey@bellsouth.net
gov> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: MPLS, IPv6 on
CCIE Lab
nobody@groupstudy
.com
06/24/2002 10:02
AM
Please respond to
"Larson, Chris
(Contractor)"
This appears to be a prevelant rumor and therefore may have some truth to
it. I have also heard (before Cisco announced it) that they were removing
token and would be replacing it with IP v. 6 and MPLS.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com [mailto:Ian.C.Stong@mail.sprint.com]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 11:59 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; jkesemey@bellsouth.net
Subject: RE: MPLS, IPv6 on CCIE Lab
The buzz so far is there is nothing mentioned about any new technologies
but rather just a greater emphasis on the existing core technologies.
Ian
www.ccie4u.com
-----Original Message-----
From: jkesemey [mailto:jkesemey@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 8:29 AM
To: ccielab
Subject: MPLS, IPv6 on CCIE Lab
Any ideas what technologies they may be adding to the lab to replace
IPX, DLSW with TR, and IGRP?
I heard mention about IPv6 and MPLS in the future.
Jeff Kesemeyer
CCNP, CCDP, MCSE, CNE
www.bradshawlabs.com
"Your CCIE Rack Rental Source"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3