From: Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 22 2002 - 11:52:47 GMT-3
Lee,
are you doing the traceroute from the router performing the load sharing?
If so, it doesn't give you a clue how the load-balancing actually takes
place as it will *always* use all links.
So a default config (ip route-cache) will give you per-destination (no ip
cef) or per <source,destination> (ip cef) load-balancing.
oli
At 13:56 20.06.2002 -0500, lee.dongsik@mail.sprint.com wrote:
>Folks,
>
>Does anyone know if there is "ip equivalent" of ipx
>per-host-load-sharing over equal cost parallel links? I tried "ip cef"
>with "ip load-sharing per-destination" but it didn't work. What I am
>trying to achieve is a sort of ip load sharing by transmitting traffic
>across multiple, equal-cost paths while guaranteeing that packets for a
>given end-host always take the same path so that successive packets to a
>given end-host will always arrive in order. I thought "ip cef" would let
>me do that but trace log still showed round-robin behavior. No, I did
>not disable fast switching here. Any input will be greatly appreciated.
>Thanks.
>
>Lee...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3