Re: Process ID selection in OSPF

From: Peng Zheng (zpnist@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 21:06:43 GMT-3


   
But how the router can decide whether other OSPF
speaking router are in same autonumous system or not.
Because there is no autonumous system indication. Is
there some example two or more process id are configed
on one router.

--- P729 <p729@cox.net> wrote:
> 'show ip ospf database' will dump the link-state
> database for each process
> ID. The router IDs under each process will give an
> indication of what makes
> up that autonomous system. An OSPF-speaking router
> implements a unique RID
> for each AS it participates in (each OSPF process).
>
> Regards,
>
> Mas Kato
> https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Peng Zheng" <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> To: <p729@cox.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Process ID selection in OSPF
>
>
> > Dear Sir,
> >
> > But I have another question. Since process ID
> number
> > is completely arbitrary, how can I decide whether
> > routers belong to same Autonamous System or not.
> >
> >
> > Thank you for help.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Peng Zheng
> > --- p729@cox.net wrote:
> > > The OSPF process ID number is completely
> arbitrary
> > > and only locally significant. It's used for
> > > distinguishing between different OSPF processes
> > > running on the same router.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Mas Kato
> > > https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> > >
> >
>
============================================================
> > > From: Peng Zheng <zpnist@yahoo.com>
> > > Date: 2002/06/20 Thu PM 04:50:13 EDT
> > > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Process ID selection in OSPF
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tried to use the Cisco Interactive Mentor, I
> > > noticed they use different process ID on
> different
> > > router. Is there any benefit in this kind of
> > > configuration?
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you for help.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Peng Zheng
> > >
> > >



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:40 GMT-3