From: steven.j.nelson@xxxxxx
Date: Thu Jun 20 2002 - 11:26:03 GMT-3
Frank,
I have tested this and if you have 2 switches with 0 in the priority then 1
will become root bridge, I think MAC address is the tie breaker.
The only way to guarantee this is to turn off STP for the given VLAN
HTH
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: FZahrt@NECBNS.com [mailto:FZahrt@NECBNS.com]
Sent: 20 June 2002 15:00
To: pita40@hotmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE:
Peter,
That is odd. I might be overstepping my knowledge level here, but I
thought if you set spantree to a priority of 0, then it could not become the
root bridge. A setting of 1 is the lowest I thought you could do for root
election, hence it would have the highest priority. If I am off base on
this, please correct me.
Frank Zahrt III
CCDP, CCNP Voice Specialist, CCSE, FSCE
NEC Senior Network Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: peter brown [mailto:pita40@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:17 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc: chrishugo@yahoo.com
Subject:
I am still having a problem answering this question about stp. If you want
to make a say vlan 10 to use the switch as a the root bridge. which of this
statement is correct.
set spantree priority 1 10
set spantree priority 0 10
I you donot want to use set spantree root command.
Help.
I did it with 2 cat 4000s and the switch with "set spantree priority 0 10"
command always wins, but I keep seeing documents that uses priority 1.
Example in Fatkid and even the link form cisco. Which one is correct for
cisco sake.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:38 GMT-3