From: ccie candidate (ccie1@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 17 2002 - 13:28:52 GMT-3
hi
what i know about this issue is that the two commands will do the same function
, the priority command is NOT recommended by Cisco ( i dont know why but this
is what is on the docs ) .
the root command will decrease the priority from the default value (32768 ) to
8192 which is enough to force your switch to be the root ( as long as you keep
the others switches to the default )
this will be equivalent to setting the priority command to 8192 as well.
i dont know what is the meaning of setting the priority to 0
but may be this will not allow the switch to be a root at all.
you check that and let me know :)))
--On Sat, 15 Jun 2002 18:53:45 Krucker, Louis wrote: >Hello group > >I'm still confused about those two commands > >set spantree root [vlan] >and >set spantree priority 0 > >Which one set the switch to the root bridge, the cco docs >doesnt clear that issue. I think its the priority command because >the root command set the root priority to 8192 instead 0. > >It would be nice if somebody can clarify this issue. >TIA >Louis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:35 GMT-3