Re: ibgp problem with network command

From: David Luu (wicked01@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 16 2002 - 01:38:35 GMT-3


   
in his topology, even without synchronization it still will not work
without an IGP or static route cause a TCP session will not be established

At 07:57 PM 6/15/2002 -0700, Chris Hugo wrote:
>Hi,
>If not running an IGP (OSPF,EIGRP, and etc.) the routes will not get
>propogated because of BGP's synchronization rule. If you don't want to run
>an IGP enable no synch in your bgp configuration.
>Hers is a great URL from Cisco.
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/459/bgp_noad.html#topic4
>hth,
>chris hugo
> chenyan <chenyan@deeptht.com.cn> wrote: R1---R2---R3---R4
>In this topology all of them are connected side by side with ibgp full
>meshed, and I used only network commands and physical interface, but R1
>cant reach R4 and R4 cant reach R1, I want to why?
>Thanks.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:33 GMT-3