Re: ibgp problem with network command

From: Howard C. Berkowitz (hcb@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jun 15 2002 - 12:11:58 GMT-3

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: VoIP in CCIE Security??"
• Previous message: chenyan: "ibgp problem with network command"
• Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "ibgp problem with network command"
• Next in thread: Nick Shah: "Re: ibgp problem with network command"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
At 10:20 PM +0800 6/15/02, chenyan wrote:
>R1---R2---R3---R4
>In this topology all of them are connected side by side with ibgp
>full meshed, and I used only network commands and physical
>interface, but R1 cant reach R4 and R4 cant reach R1, I want to why?
>Thanks.

But are they really fully meshed? To be fully meshed, you'd need iBGP between:

     R1 and R4
     R2 and R4
     R1 and R3

There is a way to achieve logical full meshing, but your
configuration doesn't do it.

• Next message: Scott Morris: "RE: VoIP in CCIE Security??"
• Previous message: chenyan: "ibgp problem with network command"
• Maybe in reply to: chenyan: "ibgp problem with network command"
• Next in thread: Nick Shah: "Re: ibgp problem with network command"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:33 GMT-3