From: Wright, Jeremy (JA_WRIGHT@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 23:42:43 GMT-3
thanks for the help. that is what i figured. my boss thought i was crazy
when i tried to explain to him the concept behind path costs. he's living
back in the rip v1 days. ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Shah
To: Wright, Jeremy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: 6/14/02 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: STP Learning
Jeremy,
You are right, STP re-election would have *absolutely nothing* to do
with
the speed / duplex of individual ports.
However a speed of a port will have a role to play in STP election (in
terms of path cost).
Hope, I havent confused you, if I have. pl. let me know :)
rgds
Nick
----- Original Message -----
From: Wright, Jeremy <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 3:57 AM
Subject: STP Learning
> just to clear something up...if i change my root bridge to be a
different
> switch, there's a re-election, flood..yada yada yada. now, since the
ports
> have to go through spanning steps, that shouldnt cause a speed/duplex
> re-negotiation on the clients PC's,correct? I believe that would be
geared
> more toward the physical layer. TIA.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ************************
> Jeremy Wright
> Network Analyst
> Archer Daniels Midland
> ja_wright@admworld.com
> (217)451-4063
>
> ************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:33 GMT-3