From: Song Mu (songmu@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jun 14 2002 - 11:45:25 GMT-3
You do not need a dialer interface on the host router if only remote
initiate the call. You can use multiple dialer map statements to map
the remote on the host. if you want to use dialer interface, each one
only associates one member. In your case, you need have two pool
members.
Song
--- George Spahl <g.spahl@insightbb.com> wrote:
> Jason,
> Here's a good link that will probably help you straighten that out.
> Look under "New Dialer Profile Model". It tells how calls are bound
> to
> dialer profiles.
>
www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fdial_c
> /fnsprt5/dcdiprof.htm#39936
>
> Hope this helps!
> George
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> Jason Wydra
> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:57 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Dialer interfaces
>
> I have two dialer interfaces on my hub router both point to dial pool
> 1
> on the BRI (Dial pool-member 1). The spoke routers have dialer
> interfaces pointing to the hub. I can only get the connection to come
> up
> when I remove one of the dialer interfaces on the hub. If I try to
> configure more than one dialer interface with dial pool 1 I get a
> failure when trying to call from the spokes. Debug shows busy signal
> on
> spoke and unbindable on hub. Please help.
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:33 GMT-3