Re: OSPF redistribution

From: Giveortake@xxxxxxx
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 17:30:23 GMT-3

• Next message: CiscoJunkie: "Token ring, IGRP, Cat5k removed from lab"
• Previous message: MADMAN: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Maybe in reply to: Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE): "OSPF redistribution"
• Next in thread: Edmund Roche-Kelly: "Re: OSPF redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
In a message dated 6/12/2002 3:49:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
dmitry_volkov@ca.ml.com writes:

> 2nd) situation:
> R2#
> !
> router ospf 30
> network 152.1.2.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
> redistribute igrp 64 metric 20 subnets
> !
> router igrp 64
> !
> network 152.11.0.0
> redistribute ospf 30 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500
> redistribute connected metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 route-map loopback --
> DIFFERENCE !!!
> NO network 152.100.0.0 - DIFFERENCE !!!
>

Situation two requires you to redisribute connected under ospf on R2 in
order to see the loopback on R1. If you look at the table on R2 the
loopback is known by being directly connected and is not in the table under
IGRP.

• Next message: CiscoJunkie: "Token ring, IGRP, Cat5k removed from lab"
• Previous message: MADMAN: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Maybe in reply to: Volkov, Dmitry (Toronto - BCE): "OSPF redistribution"
• Next in thread: Edmund Roche-Kelly: "Re: OSPF redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:32 GMT-3