Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes

From: keith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 13:21:40 GMT-3

• Next message: Shane Miles: "archives down"
• Previous message: keith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Please confirm (conf#9d3b11f6445960e3b57830791309a5c6)"
• Next in thread: MADMAN: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Maybe reply: MADMAN: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hello-

We have a client that is going to a dual homed
(separate border routers) connection to the same ISP
via separate peering nodes. I am wondering if it makes
sense to configure the necessary internal routing and
take a default from both nodes, or to take partial/full
routes. Anyone have any feedback regarding pros/cons.
We would like to get them configured to load balance
the connections, but see some issues with that config
and the Checkpoint FW's behind the routers.

Thanks for the assistance,

Keith

• Next message: Shane Miles: "archives down"
• Previous message: keith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "Re: Please confirm (conf#9d3b11f6445960e3b57830791309a5c6)"
• Next in thread: MADMAN: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Maybe reply: MADMAN: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Maybe reply: Howard C. Berkowitz: "Re: Dual homed to a single ISP on separate nodes"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:31 GMT-3