From: Carlos G Mendioroz (tron@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 10 2002 - 08:30:04 GMT-3
Why is that ???
I've just (thursday 6/6) posted a way of "fixing" this using OSPF &
BGP,
namelly making the OSPF routing domain coincide with the BGP AS, by
breaking it at the BGP borders (running 2 OSPF processes at the borders,
one for intra-AS and the other for inter-AS).
Other ways that have been talked about are turning into BGP confeds
(thus
getting rid of the iBGP sync issue) and tweeking the router IDs...
Peter van Oene wrote:
>
> Synch and route reflection are not intended to work together.
>
> At 08:19 PM 6/9/2002 -0400, Yagnesh Patel wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I know the following problem is frequently discussed in the group study
> >but couldn't find any definite answers. Can someone please direct me to
> >the possible solutions to this problem
> >
> >R2 ------IBGP-----R3 (RR)--------IBGP-------- R1 -----<EBGP>---------R4
> >
> >
> >Sync is enabled in all router. R1's reflected routes are not sync in R2
> >router.
> >
> >Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:30 GMT-3