From: Anthony Pace (anthonypace@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jun 09 2002 - 21:11:28 GMT-3
Denise,
Is this example using the 0xE in the IPX network portion to mean all
even networks, and the node address of 0000.0000.0001 because you are
confident that everything encountering this list will use the IPX
internal node address of 0000.0000.0001 ? Would it be also correct to
go with 2.0.0.0 mask E.ffff.ffff.ffff ?
Anthony Pace
On Sun, 09 Jun 2002 18:54:32 -0400, "Denise Donohue"
<fradendon@comcast.net> said:
> I know what you mean about Cisco's documentation of this. I looked for
> hours, and the most I got was that a 1 'masks' the bit. But what
> exactly do
> that mean by 'mask' - does it mean that bit has to match, or not?
> Anyway,
> if you're talking about the CyscoExpert sample lab, here's what I found
> that
> worked:
>
> access-list 1001 permit 2000.0000.0000.0001 E.0000.0000.0000 7 PRINT*
>
> (Obviously, I permitted the even nets with this list, rather than
> denying
> the odds. Why use two lines when you can use one???)
>
> It would be great if there's an IPX-pert on the list who can explain
> *why*
> it works!
>
> -- Denise
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Treptow, Georg
> Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 6:17 PM
> To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
> Subject: IPX access-list
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Can someone explain IPX network address and masks for access-list to
> me. The
> CCO has very poor examples.
>
> I am trying to block all uneven networks from entering my routing
> tables.
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
>
> Georg Treptow
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:29 GMT-3