From: Paul (p_chopin@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jun 06 2002 - 02:23:32 GMT-3
Is there any remedy except confederations?
Paul
--- "Fong, Eddy" <Eddy.Fong@hp.com> wrote:
> I think we have come across this issue before.
> Anyway, it's because the IGP route 200.100.100.0/24
> is from R2. But the iBGP route is from R3. When you
> have OSPF as IGP and want to syn with BGP, the route
> originator R-Ids have to be the same. Otherwaise
> it's not synchronized and, hence, not advertise to
> R5.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul [mailto:p_chopin@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:59 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject:
>
>
> Hi group,
> I just run into another interesting little problem.
> I have R1-R2---R3
> | |
> \ /
> R4---R5
> R1 is running RiP. R2,R3,R4,R5 are running ospf. R2
> is
> redistributing rip into ospf domain.R1 is inserting
> route 200.100.100.0/24 to BGP through network
> statement and Redistributing this route into Rip as
> well. R1 is in AS1 , R2 in AS3, and R5,R4,R5 in As
> 3.EBGP sessions R1-R2, R2-R3. IBGP sesions R3-R4,
> R4-R5. R4 is route reflector.Synch is enable on all
> the routers.Question is why on R4 BGP table says,
> that
> route 200.100.100.0/24 is not synchronized even it's
> known through ospf and is not being pushed to R5.
> All routers have hard coded identical routers id in
> ospf and BGP.
> I've been struggling almost a week with this one.I
> searched and read white papers on CCO - I still
> don't
> understand.I'm missing really something important.
> Can you help?
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:26 GMT-3