From: Erhan Kurt (kurt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 05 2002 - 11:05:40 GMT-3
OSPF summary-address or area range command works as well.
A static route to Null0 (if allowed)-redistribute static also works and
commonly used in BGP..
Erhan
-----Original Message-----
From: George Spahl [mailto:g.spahl@insightbb.com]
Sent: 05 Haziran 2002 Gar:amba 16:19
To: 'McEvoy, Joseph'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Alternatives to the network command or redistribution
I believe it was Dennis that pointed out a few weeks ago how IS-IS will add
a connected route just by using "passive-interface".
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
McEvoy, Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:57 PM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com '
Subject: Alternatives to the network command or redistribution
I can only think of one instance where you can get a routing protocol to
advertise a network without using a network command or redistribution. That
is the EIGRP summary-address command. With it, EIGRP will advertise a
summary route as long as there is one or more specific subnets in the
routing table. The cool thing is that these specific routes do not need to
be EIGRP routes, they can just as easily be RIP routes, or connected
interfaces.
Can anybody think of something similar in other routing protocols? The
question is, are there alternatives to the network command or
redistribution? Is there a way to get a routing protocol to advertise new
routes without using these commands?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:25 GMT-3