RE: about DLSW option(lf 1500)

From: Jason Sinclair (sinclairj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Jun 05 2002 - 03:47:19 GMT-3

• Next message: Hansang Bae: "Re: A router and Layer3 Switch"
• Previous message: li jian hua: "Re: Failed 1st Attempt RTP"
• Maybe in reply to: cholscurry: "about DLSW option(lf 1500)"
• Next in thread: Anthony Pace: "RE: about DLSW option(lf 1500)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
DLSW will dynamically figure out the LF size in the capabilities exchange.
Hence you do not need to set it.

Regards,

Jason Sinclair CCIE #9100
Manager, Network Control Centre
POWERTEL
Ground Level, 55 Clarence Street,
SYDNEY NSW 2000
AUSTRALIA
office: + 61 2 8264 3820
mobile: + 61 416 105 858
* sinclairj@powertel.com.au

"The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny" -
Unknown

                -----Original Message-----
                From: cholscurry [mailto:cholscurry@yahoo.co.kr]
                Sent: Wednesday, 5 June 2002 16:13
                To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
                Subject: about DLSW option(lf 1500)

                hi, all

                i have one easy question about dlsw config.

                if routerA with Ethernet and RouterB with Tokenring
                have a dlsw connection,
                do i have to use lf(largest frame) frame_size option
                on both local peer and remote peer command?

                thanks all.

• Next message: Hansang Bae: "Re: A router and Layer3 Switch"
• Previous message: li jian hua: "Re: Failed 1st Attempt RTP"
• Maybe in reply to: cholscurry: "about DLSW option(lf 1500)"
• Next in thread: Anthony Pace: "RE: about DLSW option(lf 1500)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:24 GMT-3