RE: Connected routes vs network statement

From: Peter van Oene (pvo@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jun 04 2002 - 14:30:36 GMT-3


   
Assuming that the "network" command provides the same functionality for all
protocols is also very dangerous.

At 09:40 AM 6/4/2002 -0700, Dennis Laganiere wrote:
>Some routing protocols will interpret the two differently. EIGRP, or
>instance, will see the redistributed route as external, which has a much
>higher AD.
>
>--- Dennis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>From: Paul Connelly [mailto:chewy7700@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:03 AM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Connected routes vs network statement
>
>Is there a preference in the lab when to use "redistribute connected" vs.
>network statements? I know the redistribute connected will not turn on the
>routing protocol on the interface but you can easily turn it off with
>passive-interface. Just want to check if the exam wants you to do it a
>certain way.
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:23 GMT-3