From: Michael Jia (mjia@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jun 03 2002 - 01:34:18 GMT-3
RIP v1 is classful, mask is not even in the routing update.
There is NO way you can filter base on the subnet mask.
>
> Paul,
>
> I had to use rip version 2, distribute-list, and "access-list 2 permit
> 200.200.1.0 0.0.254.255" on r2 for this to work. I had 3
> routers. r1 and r2
> run rip v2 and r2 and r3 run ospf. r3 had the 200.200.x.0/24
> networks on it
> loopback. When I changed to rip v1 it doesn't work. Not sure what your
> setup was like.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Emmanuel Oppong
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 3:59 PM
> To: Paul; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: distribution list
>
>
> Will this access-list work?
>
> access-list 100 permit 200.200.1.0 0.0.254.255 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Paul
> Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 2:44 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: distribution list
>
>
> Guys,
> I'm trying to prevent rip from learning certain
> prefixes over the interface.I only should allow
> networks 200.200.x.0/24 where x is odd number.
> I use distribute-list statement under rip. Ip prefix
> list doesn't seem to work in this case.
> Extended access list block all the networks.?When I
> use standard access lists it works, but I'm getting
> all sorts of prefixes, not just /24.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 02 2002 - 08:12:21 GMT-3